dall'Ordinanza di custodia cutelare in carcere su Nicola Cosentino
ADR: attraverso IMPREGECO s’intendeva garantire tutto il ciclo dei rifiuti, a livello regionale, e s’intendeva anche garantire the terminal phase, that of incineration, even if you thought about a different system than that applied to FIBE as such. the elettropirolisi. I note that in addition
all'IMPREGECO - which offered an alternative solution to FIBE at regional level - the political project of COSENTINO and Belly was also to "provincialization" waste, ie to create full managerial autonomy at the provincial level, involving all four consortia Basin, creating consortia specialize in certain aspects of operations.
There were also plants its CE4 Basin Consortium, the Consortium by providing not only directly but also a dump of a plant stabilization as well as screening.
The stabilizing system was formally imposed on the face with orders, in which they required the Consortium to purchase from ICOM in Milan - a company of plants - these structures.
The stabilization of waste, whether from the municipalities in the basin CE4, was implemented at those facilities. We do We said that in order to provide and implement a stabilization plant had to turn to ICOM, the only company with a patent - in his opinion - adequate. That was the only way for us to authorize the creation of a stabilization plant.
The questioning then focuses on the authorization The location of the landfill in Uttaro - Tower and the draft 'provincialization' integrated cycle of waste, involving the expulsion of ATI at least from Caserta province:
"ADR: (...) in conversation with Nicola Cosentino spoke provincialization the draft of the waste cycle, taking each other for these activities which already acted in self-sufficiency, the waste "dry" would have been destined for dumps located in Lo Uttaro-tower, not yet active at that time and never entered into year (that I know were not even purchased the land). The rejection "wet" was already established plants Santa Maria La Fossa, those located in Saurino Park, near the site. At that point it would be possible to operate an incinerator - as I expose in the conversation - to be completely independent. As you can see in this conversation, that is proven, I communicated all to COSENTINO, and receives its provision.
COSENTINO in telling me to "go on and treat this thing," alluding to the fact that I should commit myself to buy the land where the dump was to be built by Lo Uttaro, landfill "vital" at that time because the landfills were in the park Saurino via filling. We
autonomy still a few months, with Park Saurino, where the sites were used to receive waste in the district. The landfill
Lo Uttaro was enormous, and from what I explained CUNDARI - the President of CE3 where he insisted the site - could sustain for a long time all over the disposal of the Province of Caserta.
The quarry is located between Caserta and the City of San Nicola La Strada, and it was close to another landfill already exhausted.
The Consortium and the Consortium CE1 CE2 seems to me that also has a composting plant waste. The construction of the landfill
Lo Uttaro was instrumental in provincialization waste. The project was proposed by CUNDARI (President of the Consorzio C3, nde) and these had spoken with COSENTINO, with faces and with me.
I note that I never read the contract FIBE and I had a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhat it was inconsistent or not privately with the company, was do I give the technical information to De Biasi, who primarily attended the Commissioner, but it was clear, however - as can be noted in the call - that the task you wanted to play was the same place that FIBE and, therefore, unenforceable. The project was one for which we had to act at the level of the government commissioner to request that the contract was terminated for failure to comply with FIBE, I was no part of this project but it was clear that the purpose of FACCI fosse questo”.
Valente chiarisce anche le ‘vere ragioni’ della documentata (vedi le interrogazioni parlamentari annesse alla memoria difensiva del 12.11.08) avversione di Cosentino per il termovalorizzatore FIBE di Santa Maria La Fossa e del piano di provincializzazione dei rifiuti:
“ADR: (…) Nicola COSENTINO questi voleva che “tutto quel che si faceva doveva passare attraverso di lui”. Non era pensabile che la FIBE potesse realizzare un termovalorizzatore in Santa Maria La Fossa, così come chiunque che volesse procedere a una rilevante attività economica in quella zona, con carattere pubblico. Nicola COSENTINO insieme a Gennaro CORONELLA incisero sul Sindaco di Santa Maria La Fossa, Bartolo ABBATE, who made the demonstrations against the incinerator, taking a position directly at the municipal level against FIBE. Both
COSENTINO, and Coronelli, Bartolo is commonly ABBATE have always said that the incinerator was never built there and the role of the mayor and the necessary depending Coronelli COSENTINO, so ABBATE was bound to follow the line set to him. COSENTINO Nicola
I note that, for all I said to Sergio BEARS demonstrated the strength of its relationship with the politician, had a stake in the Enterprais, the acquiring company's shares in the Flora environment to say the bear, through CATERINO Louis, holder of shares. The ENTERPRAIS was in fact a 50% owned by Bear Environment Flora and the remainder by COSENTINO, through the trustee Catherine. "
Cosentino of this aversion to the incinerator which was entrusted to complete the cycle track is FISIA ITALIMPIANTI in a conversation between Anthony Russo and Sergio Orsi took place on 18.01.2004 (No. 958 (Decree 2501/03), which bears communicate:
"I learned that Cosentino brought together all the regional directors, all of these , in saying that you must stop Santa Maria La Fossa ... well because it feels blindside around anyway ... I talked and said this: that there was a meeting yesterday for all these things they want to organize in Santa Maria La Fossa ... you are pissed off, it means that you must close and you have to go somewhere else. Now where the hell it going to do, do it, he says, but we have broken the fucking because there are a tease. Because once they say you have to do Carinola, again you should not do. So if you need to make fun of us, we no longer want to pay this thing ... and yesterday met Rosario Gennaro and Coronella, Cosentino, some regional councilor, in short ... to close to Santa Maria La Fossa word "
all'IMPREGECO - which offered an alternative solution to FIBE at regional level - the political project of COSENTINO and Belly was also to "provincialization" waste, ie to create full managerial autonomy at the provincial level, involving all four consortia Basin, creating consortia specialize in certain aspects of operations.
There were also plants its CE4 Basin Consortium, the Consortium by providing not only directly but also a dump of a plant stabilization as well as screening.
The stabilizing system was formally imposed on the face with orders, in which they required the Consortium to purchase from ICOM in Milan - a company of plants - these structures.
The stabilization of waste, whether from the municipalities in the basin CE4, was implemented at those facilities. We do We said that in order to provide and implement a stabilization plant had to turn to ICOM, the only company with a patent - in his opinion - adequate. That was the only way for us to authorize the creation of a stabilization plant.
The questioning then focuses on the authorization The location of the landfill in Uttaro - Tower and the draft 'provincialization' integrated cycle of waste, involving the expulsion of ATI at least from Caserta province:
"ADR: (...) in conversation with Nicola Cosentino spoke provincialization the draft of the waste cycle, taking each other for these activities which already acted in self-sufficiency, the waste "dry" would have been destined for dumps located in Lo Uttaro-tower, not yet active at that time and never entered into year (that I know were not even purchased the land). The rejection "wet" was already established plants Santa Maria La Fossa, those located in Saurino Park, near the site. At that point it would be possible to operate an incinerator - as I expose in the conversation - to be completely independent. As you can see in this conversation, that is proven, I communicated all to COSENTINO, and receives its provision.
COSENTINO in telling me to "go on and treat this thing," alluding to the fact that I should commit myself to buy the land where the dump was to be built by Lo Uttaro, landfill "vital" at that time because the landfills were in the park Saurino via filling. We
autonomy still a few months, with Park Saurino, where the sites were used to receive waste in the district. The landfill
Lo Uttaro was enormous, and from what I explained CUNDARI - the President of CE3 where he insisted the site - could sustain for a long time all over the disposal of the Province of Caserta.
The quarry is located between Caserta and the City of San Nicola La Strada, and it was close to another landfill already exhausted.
The Consortium and the Consortium CE1 CE2 seems to me that also has a composting plant waste. The construction of the landfill
Lo Uttaro was instrumental in provincialization waste. The project was proposed by CUNDARI (President of the Consorzio C3, nde) and these had spoken with COSENTINO, with faces and with me.
I note that I never read the contract FIBE and I had a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhat it was inconsistent or not privately with the company, was do I give the technical information to De Biasi, who primarily attended the Commissioner, but it was clear, however - as can be noted in the call - that the task you wanted to play was the same place that FIBE and, therefore, unenforceable. The project was one for which we had to act at the level of the government commissioner to request that the contract was terminated for failure to comply with FIBE, I was no part of this project but it was clear that the purpose of FACCI fosse questo”.
Valente chiarisce anche le ‘vere ragioni’ della documentata (vedi le interrogazioni parlamentari annesse alla memoria difensiva del 12.11.08) avversione di Cosentino per il termovalorizzatore FIBE di Santa Maria La Fossa e del piano di provincializzazione dei rifiuti:
“ADR: (…) Nicola COSENTINO questi voleva che “tutto quel che si faceva doveva passare attraverso di lui”. Non era pensabile che la FIBE potesse realizzare un termovalorizzatore in Santa Maria La Fossa, così come chiunque che volesse procedere a una rilevante attività economica in quella zona, con carattere pubblico. Nicola COSENTINO insieme a Gennaro CORONELLA incisero sul Sindaco di Santa Maria La Fossa, Bartolo ABBATE, who made the demonstrations against the incinerator, taking a position directly at the municipal level against FIBE. Both
COSENTINO, and Coronelli, Bartolo is commonly ABBATE have always said that the incinerator was never built there and the role of the mayor and the necessary depending Coronelli COSENTINO, so ABBATE was bound to follow the line set to him. COSENTINO Nicola
I note that, for all I said to Sergio BEARS demonstrated the strength of its relationship with the politician, had a stake in the Enterprais, the acquiring company's shares in the Flora environment to say the bear, through CATERINO Louis, holder of shares. The ENTERPRAIS was in fact a 50% owned by Bear Environment Flora and the remainder by COSENTINO, through the trustee Catherine. "
Cosentino of this aversion to the incinerator which was entrusted to complete the cycle track is FISIA ITALIMPIANTI in a conversation between Anthony Russo and Sergio Orsi took place on 18.01.2004 (No. 958 (Decree 2501/03), which bears communicate:
"I learned that Cosentino brought together all the regional directors, all of these , in saying that you must stop Santa Maria La Fossa ... well because it feels blindside around anyway ... I talked and said this: that there was a meeting yesterday for all these things they want to organize in Santa Maria La Fossa ... you are pissed off, it means that you must close and you have to go somewhere else. Now where the hell it going to do, do it, he says, but we have broken the fucking because there are a tease. Because once they say you have to do Carinola, again you should not do. So if you need to make fun of us, we no longer want to pay this thing ... and yesterday met Rosario Gennaro and Coronella, Cosentino, some regional councilor, in short ... to close to Santa Maria La Fossa word "
0 comments:
Post a Comment